Not sure of your type? Try our free AI typing chat, then get verified by a real specialist.Support Socion ♥

Socion

Does the theory hold?

Socionics makes specific, falsifiable predictions about relationship quality. Here's what the data says — drawn from real connections and ratings on Socion.

274
Members
439
Connections
54
Ratings submitted

Satisfaction by relation type

Average rating left by members on their connections. Relations need at least 3 ratings to appear.

Business
5.0×3
Contrary
4.8×4
Quasi identity
4.8×4
Kindred
4.8×4
Mirror
4.5×8
Beneficiary
4.5×4
Dual
4.5×18
Illusionary
4.3×3

Most connected relation types

Which relations members actually connect in — revealed preference.

Dual
86
Mirror
35
Identity
35
Benefactor
33
Activity
32
Kindred
29
Contrary
27
Illusionary
22
Conflict
21
Quasi identity
20
Supervisor
19
Supervisee
18
Semi dual
17
Beneficiary
17
Business
15
Super ego
13

Type distribution

Which types are represented on Socion.

Alpha

ILE
30
LII
29
SEI
10
ESE
5

Beta

IEI
31
LSI
12
EIE
11
SLE
9

Gamma

ILI
39
LIE
16
ESI
14
SEE
4

Delta

EII
25
IEE
20
SLI
13
LSE
5

What members say

Recent written ratings, unedited.

Illusionary★★★★☆Jun 2026

goes smoothly for now

Mirror★★★★☆Jun 2026

Constructive feedback as expected.

Mirror★★★★☆Jun 2026

The Si relation is real. But their Te isn't hitting me as hard as it should. Too similar. So maybe I'm not the type I think I am. Have to keep trying with other types.

Illusionary★★★★★Jun 2026

proactive, very positive

Dual★★★★★Jun 2026

Lol we both hesitated to write each other at first but he seems okay

Dual★★★★☆Jun 2026

やり取りを始めたばかりの方なのでまだ判定するのには早すぎますが、現段階で別段居心地は悪くありません!

Dual★★★★★May 2026

Effortlessly satisfying

Dual★★★★★Apr 2026

based

Kindred★★★★★Apr 2026

Based

Super ego★★★★★Apr 2026

Based

Every connection and rating contributes to this dataset. The more members rate their connections, the clearer the picture becomes.