Not sure of your type? Try our free AI typing chat, then get verified by a real specialist.Support Socion ♥

Socion

Does the theory hold?

Socionics makes specific, falsifiable predictions about relationship quality. Here's what the data says, drawn from real connections and ratings on Socion.

300
Members
463
Connections
56
Ratings submitted

Satisfaction by relation type

Average rating left by members on their connections. Relations need at least 3 ratings to appear.

Business
5.0×3
Contrary
4.8×4
Quasi identity
4.8×4
Kindred
4.8×4
Dual
4.6×20
Beneficiary
4.5×4
Mirror
4.4×7
Illusionary
4.3×3

Most connected relation types

Which relations members actually connect in, revealed preference.

Dual
97
Identity
38
Activity
37
Mirror
37
Benefactor
33
Kindred
29
Contrary
28
Illusionary
22
Conflict
21
Quasi identity
20
Supervisor
19
Semi dual
18
Supervisee
18
Beneficiary
17
Business
16
Super ego
13

Type distribution

Which types are represented on Socion.

Alpha

ILE
34
LII
32
SEI
11
ESE
4

Beta

IEI
32
EIE
12
LSI
12
SLE
10

Gamma

ILI
40
LIE
19
ESI
18
SEE
4

Delta

EII
31
IEE
22
SLI
13
LSE
5

What members say

Recent written ratings, unedited.

Illusionary★★★★☆Jun 2026

goes smoothly for now

Mirror★★★★☆Jun 2026

Constructive feedback as expected.

Mirror★★★★☆Jun 2026

The Si relation is real. But their Te isn't hitting me as hard as it should. Too similar. So maybe I'm not the type I think I am. Have to keep trying with other types.

Illusionary★★★★★Jun 2026

proactive, very positive

Dual★★★★★Jun 2026

Lol we both hesitated to write each other at first but he seems okay

Dual★★★★☆Jun 2026

やり取りを始めたばかりの方なのでまだ判定するのには早すぎますが、現段階で別段居心地は悪くありません!

Dual★★★★★May 2026

Effortlessly satisfying

Dual★★★★★Apr 2026

based

Kindred★★★★★Apr 2026

Based

Super ego★★★★★Apr 2026

Based

Every connection and rating contributes to this dataset. The more members rate their connections, the clearer the picture becomes.