Not sure of your type? Try our free AI typing chat, then get verified by a real specialist.Support Socion ♥

Socion

Does the theory hold?

Socionics makes specific, falsifiable predictions about relationship quality. Here's what the data says — drawn from real connections and ratings on Socion.

253
Members
422
Connections
50
Ratings submitted

Satisfaction by relation type

Average rating left by members on their connections. Relations need at least 3 ratings to appear.

Business
5.0×3
Contrary
4.8×4
Quasi identity
4.7×3
Kindred
4.7×3
Mirror
4.5×8
Beneficiary
4.5×4
Dual
4.4×16
Illusionary
4.3×3

Most connected relation types

Which relations members actually connect in — revealed preference.

Dual
81
Mirror
33
Identity
33
Activity
31
Kindred
29
Benefactor
29
Contrary
26
Illusionary
22
Conflict
21
Quasi identity
20
Supervisor
19
Supervisee
17
Business
16
Beneficiary
16
Semi dual
15
Super ego
14

Type distribution

Which types are represented on Socion.

Alpha

LII
28
ILE
27
SEI
9
ESE
6

Beta

IEI
27
LSI
12
EIE
11
SLE
9

Gamma

ILI
35
LIE
15
ESI
15
SEE
4

Delta

EII
21
IEE
17
SLI
11
LSE
5

What members say

Recent written ratings, unedited.

Illusionary★★★★☆Jun 2026

goes smoothly for now

Mirror★★★★☆Jun 2026

Constructive feedback as expected.

Mirror★★★★☆Jun 2026

The Si relation is real. But their Te isn't hitting me as hard as it should. Too similar. So maybe I'm not the type I think I am. Have to keep trying with other types.

Illusionary★★★★★Jun 2026

proactive, very positive

Dual★★★★★Jun 2026

Lol we both hesitated to write each other at first but he seems okay

Dual★★★★☆Jun 2026

やり取りを始めたばかりの方なのでまだ判定するのには早すぎますが、現段階で別段居心地は悪くありません!

Dual★★★★★May 2026

Effortlessly satisfying

Dual★★★★★Apr 2026

based

Kindred★★★★★Apr 2026

Based

Super ego★★★★★Apr 2026

Based

Every connection and rating contributes to this dataset. The more members rate their connections, the clearer the picture becomes.