Not sure of your type? Try our free AI typing chat, then get verified by a real specialist.Support Socion ♥

Socion

Does the theory hold?

Socionics makes specific, falsifiable predictions about relationship quality. Here's what the data says — drawn from real connections and ratings on Socion.

244
Members
394
Connections
50
Ratings submitted

Satisfaction by relation type

Average rating left by members on their connections. Relations need at least 3 ratings to appear.

Business
5.0×3
Contrary
4.8×4
Quasi identity
4.7×3
Kindred
4.7×3
Mirror
4.5×8
Beneficiary
4.5×4
Dual
4.4×16
Illusionary
4.3×3

Most connected relation types

Which relations members actually connect in — revealed preference.

Dual
73
Mirror
32
Identity
31
Activity
30
Kindred
28
Benefactor
28
Contrary
22
Illusionary
21
Quasi identity
20
Supervisor
19
Business
16
Supervisee
16
Beneficiary
16
Semi dual
15
Conflict
15
Super ego
12

Type distribution

Which types are represented on Socion.

Alpha

LII
27
ILE
26
SEI
9
ESE
6

Beta

IEI
27
LSI
12
EIE
10
SLE
8

Gamma

ILI
34
LIE
15
ESI
14
SEE
2

Delta

EII
20
IEE
17
SLI
11
LSE
5

What members say

Recent written ratings, unedited.

Illusionary★★★★☆3w ago

goes smoothly for now

Mirror★★★★☆4w ago

Constructive feedback as expected.

Mirror★★★★☆Jun 2026

The Si relation is real. But their Te isn't hitting me as hard as it should. Too similar. So maybe I'm not the type I think I am. Have to keep trying with other types.

Illusionary★★★★★Jun 2026

proactive, very positive

Dual★★★★★Jun 2026

Lol we both hesitated to write each other at first but he seems okay

Dual★★★★☆Jun 2026

やり取りを始めたばかりの方なのでまだ判定するのには早すぎますが、現段階で別段居心地は悪くありません!

Dual★★★★★May 2026

Effortlessly satisfying

Dual★★★★★Apr 2026

based

Kindred★★★★★Apr 2026

Based

Super ego★★★★★Apr 2026

Based

Every connection and rating contributes to this dataset. The more members rate their connections, the clearer the picture becomes.